Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Alexandra Mendes

Min Read

June 5, 2025

Best CI/CD Tools in 2025: Compare Features and Use Cases

Illustration of a woman pointing at an infinity loop diagram explaining the best CI/CD tools process stages.

CI/CD refers to Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery, a DevOps approach that automates code testing and deployment. CI/CD tools help teams release software faster, improve reliability and reduce errors. This guide reviews the best CI/CD tools of 2025 that offer advanced features for scalability, collaboration and security.

How do you choose the best CI/CD tool for your team?

Selecting the right CI/CD tool depends on your team's size, workflow complexity, existing infrastructure, and long-term DevOps goals. The best CI/CD tools support automation, scalability, and seamless integration with your tech stack. To make an informed decision, evaluate core features and licensing models that match your operational and compliance requirements.

What features should you look for in a CI/CD platform?

A robust CI/CD platform should provide more than just pipeline automation. Look for the following core features to ensure performance, flexibility, and team productivity:

  • Pipeline Configuration: YAML or UI-based support for build and deployment steps

  • Scalability: Ability to handle parallel builds, cloud-native deployments, and microservices

  • Integration Support: Compatible with Git repositories, Docker, Kubernetes, cloud providers, and test frameworks

  • Security and Compliance: Built-in secrets management, role-based access control (RBAC), audit logs, and compliance with standards like SOC 2 or ISO 27001

  • Observability: Real-time logging, dashboarding, and alerting for pipeline health

  • Developer Experience: Fast feedback loops, custom scripting, and reusable templates

Example:
GitHub Actions offers native Git integration and reusable workflows, while CircleCI excels in speed and parallelism.

Should you use an open-source or commercial solution?

The choice between open-source and commercial CI/CD tools hinges on control, support, and operational priorities.

Open-source tools (e.g. Jenkins, Drone, Buildkite):

  • Offer flexibility and full customisation.

  • Requires in-house setup and maintenance.

  • Ideal for engineering teams with a high level of DevOps maturity.

Commercial platforms (e.g. CircleCI, GitLab, Spacelift):

  • Provide hosted infrastructure, service-level agreements (SLAs), and user support.

  • Include advanced features like usage analytics and compliance controls.

  • Scale more easily for distributed teams or enterprise environments.

Key Consideration:
If security, uptime, and regulatory compliance are priorities, a commercial CI/CD solution with managed infrastructure may provide faster time to value and reduced operational overhead.

blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

Which are the best CI/CD tools available in 2025?

The most effective CI/CD tools in 2025 strike a balance between speed, automation, flexibility, and security. Your choice should depend on your team’s DevOps maturity, infrastructure preferences, and integration needs. Below is a curated selection of the best platforms, with in-depth context to help you decide.

1. Jenkins

Jenkins logo

Jenkins is a long-standing, open-source CI/CD tool known for its flexibility and customisability. Built in Java, it supports thousands of plugins for integrating with virtually any development, test, or deployment tool.

  • Deployment model: Self-hosted.

  • Pipeline configuration: Declarative (Jenkinsfile) or scripted.

  • Best for: Complex enterprise environments and legacy systems.

  • Use case: Enterprises needing deep custom automation across legacy and cloud workloads.

Key features:

  • Plugin ecosystem with over 1,800 plugins.

  • Integration with Docker, Kubernetes, Maven, and Git.

  • Strong community, but requires DevOps expertise to maintain.

2. GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions logo

GitHub Actions is a cloud-native CI/CD platform embedded directly into GitHub, making it ideal for teams already using GitHub for version control.

  • Deployment model: Cloud-native, fully managed.

  • Pipeline configuration: YAML-based workflows in .github/workflows/

  • Best for: Product teams focused on speed, automation, and GitOps workflows.

  • Use case: Small to mid-size SaaS teams deploying frequently from GitHub repos.

Key features:

  • Seamless GitHub repo integration.

  • Marketplace with prebuilt actions for AWS, Azure, and Docker.

  • Matrix builds, reusable workflows, and self-hosted runners for advanced use.

3. CircleCI

CircleCI logo

CircleCI offers fast, flexible pipelines optimised for container-based deployments. Known for its performance at scale, it supports both cloud and on-prem environments.

  • Deployment model: Cloud or self-hosted.

  • Pipeline configuration: YAML via .circleci/config.yml

  • Best for: Fast-moving product teams and high-throughput engineering orgs.

  • Use case: Startups and scale-ups deploying containerised microservices.

Key features:

  • Optimised Docker layer caching.

  • Native support for parallelism and custom executor images.

  • Prebuilt integrations for GitHub, Bitbucket, AWS, and Slack.

4. GitLab CI/CD

GitLab CI/CD logo

GitLab offers a unified DevOps platform with native CI/CD tightly integrated into its version control system. It enables code management, testing, security scanning and deployment within a single interface.

  • Deployment model: Cloud or self-managed (on-premise).

  • Pipeline configuration: .gitlab-ci.yml

  • Best for: Teams seeking a single DevOps platform for SCM, CI, and security.

  • Use case: Enterprises standardising on one tool for everything from planning to production.

Key features:

  • Auto DevOps with built-in security testing.

  • Kubernetes integration and GitOps-style deployments.

  • Built-in monitoring and approvals workflow.

5. Spacelift

Spacelift logo

Spacelift is a specialised CI/CD platform built for infrastructure-as-code (IaC) workflows. It focuses on security, policy-as-code and deep Terraform integration.

  • Deployment model: Cloud-hosted with remote runners.

  • Pipeline configuration: Policy-as-code with Open Policy Agent (OPA).

  • Best for: Platform engineering, cloud infrastructure teams, and regulated industries.

  • Use case: Organisations managing large-scale cloud infrastructure with Terraform or Pulumi.

Key features:

  • Native support for Terraform, Pulumi, and CloudFormation.

  • Policy-as-code using OPA for granular permissions and compliance enforcement.

  • Secrets management, drift detection, audit trails, and Git integration.

How do these platforms compare in performance, integrations and support?

Table comparing best CI/CD tools

Tip: When comparing tools, prioritise compatibility with your current stack, pipeline visibility, and the availability of vendor support.

blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

Which CI/CD tools work best for specific team types and industries?

The best CI/CD tool is the one that fits your team’s structure, regulatory needs and development environment. Whether you're a lean startup, a large enterprise or part of a regulated industry, tool selection should reflect the unique constraints and goals of your workflow.

What’s recommended for startups, enterprises and remote teams?

Startups and fast-growing teams

Startups need speed, ease of setup and minimal overhead. They often favour cloud-native tools that require little infrastructure management.

Recommended tools:

  • GitHub Actions: Ideal for rapid iteration within existing GitHub workflows.

  • CircleCI (cloud): Fast performance and simple YAML setup for container-based apps.

Why:

  • Short setup time.

  • Low to no infrastructure cost.

  • Built-in integrations with cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Vercel).

Enterprises and large-scale engineering organisations

Larger teams need fine-grained access controls, high concurrency, and compliance features.

Recommended tools:

  • GitLab CI/CD: A full DevOps suite with security scanning and audit trails

  • Jenkins: Highly configurable for hybrid, legacy or cross-platform architectures

Why:

  • Supports compliance (e.g. ISO 27001, SOC 2).

  • Can handle thousands of concurrent jobs.

  • Flexible pipeline governance and approval workflows.

Remote-first and distributed teams

Distributed teams benefit from tools that support visibility, async collaboration and decentralised infrastructure.

Recommended tools:

  • CircleCI: Real-time insights, team-based permissions.

  • Spacelift: Designed for platform teams and IaC operations with remote runners.

Why:

  • Cloud-native access from anywhere.

  • Built-in collaboration via Git-based workflows.

  • Slack and notification integrations for remote visibility.

Which CI/CD tools support AI/ML workflows and MLOps?

Machine learning workflows introduce distinct challenges to software delivery, including model versioning, experiment tracking, handling large datasets, and multi-step training pipelines. Traditional CI/CD tools are increasingly being extended to support MLOps: the practice of operationalising machine learning in production environments.

Here are some of the most widely used CI/CD tools and frameworks that support ML pipelines:

Kubeflow Pipelines

Kubeflow Pipelines is an open-source platform for building and deploying portable, scalable ML workflows on Kubernetes. It supports orchestration of training, validation and deployment steps using containerised components.

  • Best for: Teams running ML workloads in Kubernetes-native environments.

  • Use case: Model training pipelines with TensorFlow, PyTorch or ONNX.

  • CI/CD tie-in: Often integrated with Argo Workflows and GitOps tools.

Case Study: CERN

CERN uses Kubeflow Pipelines to process and analyse particle physics data at scale. They implemented containerised ML workflows to detect anomalies and retrain models using real-time sensor input.

GitHub Actions + MLflow

GitHub Actions can automate machine learning (ML) tasks, such as triggering training jobs, logging metrics, or promoting models through environments using MLflow.

  • Best for: Data science teams already using GitHub for source control.

  • Use case: Model lifecycle automation, experiment tracking, reproducible builds.

  • CI/CD tie-in: Schedule retraining pipelines, deploy models, and log artefacts.

Case Study: Shopify

Shopify integrates GitHub Actions and MLflow to automate forecasting models for demand planning. Engineers push changes to GitHub, triggering retraining jobs that log performance metrics and register deployment models.

Jenkins X for ML Projects

Jenkins X provides Kubernetes-native CI/CD pipelines and supports containerised ML applications using Helm, Kustomize or KServe for model deployment.

  • Best for: Teams with advanced Kubernetes experience and container-based ML workloads.

  • Use case: Full ML training and inference deployment within Kubernetes.

  • CI/CD tie-in: Auto-promotion between environments based on model testing outcomes.

AWS SageMaker Pipelines + CodePipeline

For AWS-based teams, SageMaker Pipelines integrates with AWS CodePipeline to automate training, model approval, and deployment workflows.

  • Best for: Enterprises already embedded in the AWS ecosystem.

  • Use case: ML workflows requiring compliance, audit logs, and production-grade infrastructure.

  • CI/CD tie-in: Model registry integration, deployment staging, and endpoint management.

Case Study: Siemens

Siemens Healthineers uses SageMaker Pipelines and CodePipeline to automate ML-driven diagnostics. Pipelines include differential testing, data drift detection and staged approvals before model promotion to production.

Azure ML + Azure DevOps

Azure ML enables end-to-end machine learning lifecycle management, with Azure DevOps facilitating CI/CD for model deployment, retraining, and rollback.

  • Best for: Organisations using Azure for infrastructure and application hosting.

  • Use case: Automated ML training, deployment approvals, and model drift alerts.

  • CI/CD tie-in: DevOps triggers on model validation, Git integration, pipeline versioning.

Why this matters

MLOps integration ensures machine learning models follow the same discipline as software releases, making them more robust, reproducible and scalable. By using CI/CD tools that support ML workflows, teams can:

  • Reduce time-to-production for data science initiatives.

  • Improve governance of models across environments.

  • Automate retraining and validation steps.

  • Track performance regressions over time.

4 Strategies to Improve the Relevance of your Business using Data Science call to action

Are some tools better for regulated industries like finance or healthcare?

Yes, compliance-heavy sectors require tools that prioritise security, traceability and policy enforcement by design.

Recommended tools:

  • Spacelift: Policy-as-code, full audit logging and SOC 2 compliance.

  • GitLab CI/CD (self-hosted): Control over infrastructure, built-in DAST/SAST scanning.

  • Jenkins (with hardened setup): Full control and custom security configurations.

Key capabilities to look for:

  • Audit logs and role-based access control (RBAC).

  • Secrets management and secure credential handling.

  • Compliance reporting and traceable approvals.

  • Support for air-gapped environments.
blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

How do top teams implement CI/CD in real-world environments?

Successful CI/CD implementation requires more than just selecting the right tool. It involves aligning processes, infrastructure and culture around continuous delivery. Leading teams apply CI/CD to reduce release friction, enforce code quality, and accelerate innovation without sacrificing control or security.

What are examples of successful CI/CD adoption in DevOps workflows?

Global streaming deployment at Netflix with Spinnaker and Jenkins

Netflix operates at a massive scale, pushing thousands of production changes daily across a globally distributed architecture. To meet this demand, Netflix developed and implemented a custom CI/CD pipeline built on open-source tools.

Implementation highlights:

  • Continuous Integration: Automated build and test pipelines allowed engineers to receive near-instant feedback on code changes.

  • Multi-Cloud Continuous Delivery: Enabled seamless deployment to multiple environments and supported canary releases and rollbacks.

  • Infrastructure Automation: Managed large-scale cloud deployments on AWS with reduced manual intervention.

  • Resilience Testing: Proactively tested failure scenarios in production, strengthening system reliability.

Key outcomes:

  • Significantly faster release cycles, enabling continuous deployment to production with high confidence.

  • Improved system reliability, driven by intentional failure testing and rollback safety mechanisms.

  • Optimised engineering efficiency, allowing developers to ship features faster while reducing operational friction.

  • Scalable architecture, adaptable to both monolithic services and microservices environments.

What metrics show whether a CI/CD setup is working well?

Top-performing teams track the following DevOps metrics to measure the effectiveness of their CI/CD implementation:

  • Deployment Frequency: How often code is deployed to production.

  • Lead Time for Changes: Time between code commit and production release.

  • Change Failure Rate: Percentage of deployments that result in incidents or rollbacks.

  • Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR): Time taken to resolve production issues.

  • Pipeline Duration: Time to complete a full CI/CD pipeline run.

Tracking these metrics helps teams detect bottlenecks, optimise performance and justify further DevOps investment.

blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

What mistakes should you avoid when adopting a CI/CD platform?

Even the best CI/CD tools can fail to deliver results if implementation is rushed, misaligned with team workflows, or overly complex. Avoiding common pitfalls ensures a smoother rollout, faster value realisation, and better long-term scalability.

What are the most common setup pitfalls for new users?

  1. Overcomplicating the pipeline too early
    Teams often attempt to replicate enterprise-grade workflows before validating the fundamentals. Start small: validate core build, test, and deploy stages before layering on advanced controls.

  2. Skipping security from the start
    Integrating static analysis, secrets management and role-based access early avoids future rework and audit failures. Choose tools that offer built-in or easily integrated security features.

  3. Lack of environmental parity
    Inconsistent environments between staging and production lead to failed deployments. Use containerisation and infrastructure-as-code (e.g. Terraform) to maintain parity.

  4. Poor version control integration
    CI/CD should be tightly linked to Git workflows. If pipelines aren’t triggered by code changes or pull requests, your automation won’t scale.

  5. Neglecting developer onboarding
    A powerful CI/CD pipeline is useless if only a few team members understand how to use it. Document workflows clearly and include training in your DevOps onboarding process to ensure seamless integration.

How can you future-proof your CI/CD architecture for scale and security?

  • Adopt a modular pipeline design
    Use reusable templates and split your pipeline into logical stages. This makes updates easier and helps avoid duplication across services.

  • Choose tools with policy-as-code and audit logging
    As your team grows or enters regulated markets, platforms like Spacelift or GitLab (Ultimate tier) can enforce security and compliance without slowing delivery.

  • Use observability from day one
    Integrate monitoring tools like Prometheus, Datadog, or built-in platform dashboards to track pipeline health, job failures, and deployment frequency.
  • Invest in internal DevOps champions
    Empower individuals to own and evolve CI/CD practices. A decentralised approach reduces bottlenecks and supports scaling across multiple teams.
blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

What expert advice can help you make the right CI/CD tool decision?

Choosing a CI/CD platform involves evaluating how well a tool aligns with your team's workflows, infrastructure, and delivery goals. Industry practitioners emphasise compatibility, simplicity, and scalability as key success factors.

What do experienced DevOps teams prioritise when selecting a platform?

  • Workflow compatibility: Choose a platform that aligns with your team’s existing development practices, particularly your version control system (e.g., GitHub or GitLab). Forcing a new way of working can reduce adoption and introduce friction.

  • Scalability under real workloads: Ensure the tool can support increasing deployment frequency, concurrent builds, and integration with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes.

  • Developer autonomy: Choose tools that streamline the developer experience — fast feedback loops, clear pipeline logs, and simple onboarding contribute to wider usage and fewer bottlenecks.

  • Security and compliance by default: Look for built-in or native support for secrets management, policy enforcement, and audit logs — especially if you operate in regulated sectors.

  • Extensibility: Open standards, such as YAML, webhooks, and reusable pipeline templates, help future-proof your workflows as your architecture evolves. Match tool choice to your team’s maturity and workflow to avoid friction.

How can engineering leaders assess real-world tool performance?

  1. Start with a scoped pilot
    Implement CI/CD in one service or microservice to test ease of configuration, build speed, and support responsiveness. Start small and scale incrementally. Avoid judging based on ideal demos or sandbox environments.

  2. Benchmark critical metrics
    Track pipeline duration, parallelism limits, and rollback capabilities during your evaluation. Prioritise practical metrics over feature checklists.

  3. Review platform support and ecosystem maturity
    Opt for tools with strong documentation, an active plugin ecosystem, and public customer success stories. These indicators signal long-term reliability and lower onboarding costs.
  4. Assess alignment with long-term delivery goals
    Ask: Will this platform support your future state — multi-cloud deployments, policy-as-code, or cross-team governance? Make sure your choice can evolve with your architecture.
blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right CI/CD tool is both a technical and a strategic decision. The best solution is the one that aligns with your existing workflows, scales with your infrastructure, and enables your team to deliver quality software faster and more reliably. 

Prioritise ease of integration, support for your tech stack, and long-term scalability when making your final choice.

Need expert guidance on choosing the right CI/CD solution? Our team specialises in helping development teams streamline their software delivery pipelines. Get in touch with us today to discuss your requirements and explore the best-fit tools for your infrastructure, team size and compliance needs.

blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo
blue arrow to the left
Imaginary Cloud logo

Frequently Asked Questions

What tool is used for CI/CD?

There are many tools used for CI/CD depending on your tech stack and requirements. Popular choices include Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, CircleCI, and Spacelift. These platforms automate build, test and deployment processes to support continuous software delivery.

What is the most popular CI/CD tool?

Jenkins remains one of the most widely adopted CI/CD tools due to its open-source flexibility and extensive plugin ecosystem. However, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD have gained popularity for their native integration with source control platforms and ease of use.

Is Kubernetes a CI/CD tool?

No. Kubernetes is not a CI/CD tool. It is a container orchestration platform. However, many CI/CD pipelines are designed to deploy applications directly into Kubernetes clusters using integrations with tools like Argo CD, Flux, or Spinnaker.

Is Azure DevOps a CI/CD tool?

Yes. Azure DevOps includes a fully featured CI/CD service called Azure Pipelines, which supports multi-platform build, test, and deployment automation. It works with GitHub, Bitbucket and other repos, and integrates natively with Microsoft Azure cloud services.

Is there a free CI/CD tool suitable for beginners?

Yes. GitHub Actions is free for public repositories and offers generous limits for private projects. It’s ideal for beginners due to its native GitHub integration, simple YAML configuration, and the absence of infrastructure management requirements.

Can a single platform effectively handle both integration and deployment stages?

Yes. Most modern CI/CD tools support both stages within a single pipeline. GitLab CI/CD, CircleCI, and Spacelift allow teams to build, test, and deploy code using a single, streamlined configuration.

Are CI/CD tools only for large teams?

No. CI/CD is equally valuable for small teams and solo developers. Automation reduces manual errors, speeds up testing, and improves deployment reliability, regardless of team size. Tools like GitHub Actions and CircleCI scale flexibly.

How do I know if a CI/CD tool supports my tech stack?

Check the tool’s documentation for official integrations with languages, frameworks, cloud providers and version control systems. Most CI/CD platforms support Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, and popular programming languages like Python, Java, and Node.js.

What’s the difference between Continuous Delivery and Continuous Deployment?

  • Continuous Delivery: Code is automatically tested and prepared for release, but requires manual approval to deploy.
  • Continuous Deployment: Every passing change is automatically released to production without manual steps.

Both build on Continuous Integration and aim to speed up release cycles.

Build scalable products with web and mobile development call to action
Alexandra Mendes
Alexandra Mendes

Content writer with a big curiosity about the impact of technology on society. Always surrounded by books and music.

Read more posts by this author

People who read this post, also found these interesting:

arrow left
arrow to the right
Dropdown caret icon